posted by Shahram Ali | July 28, 2013
6.9 Billion Rs. were paid to this IPP as soon as PMLN came in power
Minister for Water & Power has a sizeable stake in IPP PakGen - Spent almost Rs 50 million getting it
second only to Mian Mansha group
Minister for Water & Power has a sizeable stake in IPP PakGen - Spent almost Rs 50 million getting it
second only to Mian Mansha group
PML-N MNA Khawaja Asif is the owne of IPP -PakGen Limited formerly AES Pak Gen Limited in pakistan (Unlimited Mega Corruption by Mian Nawaz Sharif and Mian Mansha |
BigNews: Khawaj Asif has Shares of Rs. 50 Million (5 crore) in IPP PAKGEN
Second higest only to MCB (which is again of Mansha)
This is another MANSHA COMPANY
PakGen's majority shareholder is Mansha family, a close friend of the PM - interesting that the Minister for Water and Power has a share too
Source:
PAGE NUMBER 6
http://lalpir.com/finance/pdf/1.pdf
Second higest only to MCB (which is again of Mansha)
This is another MANSHA COMPANY
PakGen's majority shareholder is Mansha family, a close friend of the PM - interesting that the Minister for Water and Power has a share too
Source:
PAGE NUMBER 6
http://lalpir.com/finance/pdf/1.pdf
_______________________ xx ________________________
Re: BIG Exposure: Minister Khawaj Asif has Shares in Power Company PAKGEN
Image of fraud payment of bogus circular debit of IPP 6.9 Billion Rs. were paid to this IPP as soon as PMLN came in power |
___________ xx _____________
posted by Shahram Ali | July 28, 2013 | In Newspaper Articles - See more at: http://lubpak.com/archives/278031#sthash.IvuPTZgk.dpuf
Mian Muhammad Mega Corruption in Power Sector IPP's, and major beneficiary of bogus circular debt in pakistan. |
A letter about the energy policy,
blaming a gang of four for what is described as a con operation, had the
parliamentary corridors on fire.
The thrust of the letter was that
the IPPs are being paid in the name of clearing circular debt as part of a
larger conspiracy. It questions the credentials of the people who are involved
in the energy policy and alleges this to be a clear case of conflict of
interest. The quartet is named as Mian Mohammad Mansha, his nephew
Shahzad Saleem, Nadeem Babar and Saqib Shirazi of the Atlas Group.
The key players, according to the
anonymous letter, are IPP power plant owners—mainly Sapphire Power, Liberty
Power (Mukati Group of Karachi) and, among others, Said Power. The hired
henchmen for them are Abdullah Yousaf (Chairman of IPPs Association—IPPAC),
Mussadaq Malik (Special Assistant to the PM and Minister of Water and Power)
and Shahid Sattar (Planning Commission official).
It gives profiles of all of them,
which raises a number of questions about them but Sheeshnag keeps it for the
moment and only mentions the profile of one—Mussadaq Malik.
He is described as somebody who gets
in every government from Musharraf to the Interim government and is now part of
the PML (N). He is a pharmacist who first emerged as the expert of development
in Nasim Ashraf’s National Commission of the Human Development. Now he comes as
the biggest energy expert that this country ever saw. Most people remember him
as the Jamiat’s goon from FC College in Lahore. He was recommended by Syed
Babar Ali to Nawaz Sharif to which Mian Sahb readily agreed—such being the
mutual back-scratching arrangement among the tycoons. It is yet to be seen what
Syed Babar Ali, otherwise a rare respected tycoon, saw in this
pharmacist-turned-developer-turned-energy expert.
The letter explains in detail the
energy policy of 1994 and 2002 and concludes that “the project costs,
operational expenses, debt repayments and return on equity is covered under the
Capacity Purchase Price (CPP) invoice and the fuel cost is covered under the
Energy Purchase Price (EPP). Both investors are forwarded separately by
companies to NTDC/WAPDA.”
The letter gives a long detail of
what it alleges to be a scam. In short, it says, “the 1994 Power Policy IPPs
(total 14) continue to skim and make illegal profits on the fuel (both liquid
and gas fired plants) by lying about their heat rebates (plant efficiency).
Such profits are conservatively estimated to be four to five per cent. Due to
delays and tariff deals, they lost the remaining cushion/padding, yet have made
fabulous returns.”
“The 2002 Power Policy IPPs (total
13) over invoiced the initial project setting up cost and continue to skim and
make illegal profits on operational expenses and heat rate (fuel consumption).
They skim money at three levels (excluding the original project
cost)—operational expense, over invoiced fuel and kickbacks from OMCs.”
The letter alleges that annual
returns are in the range of 35 percent to 40 percent. “Inclusive of original
project cost—a payback period of two years. Not bad.”
The letter asks some questions:
Why did the PM-designate visit
Mansha’s Raiwind farm for a briefing on circular debts and energy issues?
Considering that Mansha is the leader of the nine IUPPs who have invoked
Government of Pakistan guarantee and is in the Supreme Court, to say the least,
was it not embarrassing?
Mansha and Nadeem Babar are in the
energy task force. Guess what—their key recommendation—pay IPPs. Isn’t this a
conflict of interest?
Munir Malik was the lawyer of IPPs.
How will he defend the case of the State as Attorney General against them?
Why did PPIB and NEPRA approve
without background the checking the efficiency of diesel gensets installed at
the Mansha and Atlas plants and indeed the efficiency/heat rate of all power
plants set up under 2002 power policy?
Is it true that the government is
giving Muzaffargarh power plant to Mansha? If so, why not bid it first?
Why doesn’t the government adjust
the “stolen amounts” and then the tariff formula?
It suggests that the government
should ask the IPPs to share the burden with the masses. “The full adjustment
should be made in six to eight quarterly payments. This will save the
government Rs 200 billion as equity for starting the mid-term programme of
setting up coal fired projects. Assuming a 70/30 debt equity ratio, as used by
the IPPs, the government can set up thousand MWs of power generation in next
three years.”
Now, all of this seems to come from
another lobby, which definitely has an interest. But they do have a point that
needs to be studied. Otherwise, they have sent it to the SC for taking it up.
God save us.
Source:
- See more at:
http://lubpak.com/archives/278031#sthash.hWDZnO6P.dpuf
No comments:
Post a Comment